bloggir's blog
Teachers primitivism
The proposed standard creates a very narrow corridor of educational opportunities A year ago, January 20, 2010, President Dmitry Medvedev issued a "national education initiative" Our new school. " This initiative was significant for at least three respects. First, she was nominated in the dead time of counter-school. Secondly, it is fundamentally incompatible with neo-Darwinian social ideology and content of the counter-reform. Finally, thirdly, it is, in fact, offered to build the school, whose contours were clearly delineated in the period of rise of social-pedagogical movement in the late 1980s - in the famous manifesto "pedagogy of cooperation" and "The Concept of general secondary education" developed by INEC "School". Battle standard Precisely because of these reasons the educational initiative of the President, which he assumed the status of national, and caused widespread interest and a surge of hope at the education community. However, these hopes were left hanging in the air, as in 2010, nothing was done to implement these proposals. Moreover, at the end of 2010 there was a kind of kontrinitsiativa - approved by the ruling party "United Russia", the Ministry of Education and Science and the Bureau of the Russian Academy of Education draft standard secondary (complete) general education. This project not only builds a new one, it destroys the existing national school, and with it - and the future of the country. In accordance with the draft (prepared by the Institute of Strategic Studies in Education of the Russian Academy of Education) in upper school, in 10th and 11th grades, should remain four compulsory subjects: two old - Training and life safety, and two new ones - "Russia in the World" and a "Solo Project", a fact which no one has any idea. The remaining items - by choice, and each of the educational field, you can choose only one or two subjects. Results should be no more than seven. Selection will be made of six educational areas: the Russian language and literature, home language and literature, foreign languages, social sciences, mathematics and computer science, natural sciences. That is, for example, from a block of natural sciences have to choose between physics, chemistry and biology, social sciences from the block - between history, social studies, geography, economics, law, etc. The state is going to pay for tuition only for the ten subjects, all the rest - for a fee. Naturally, the impression was that just for the sake of this and start a new standard. Of course - for the sake of it, but not only. The standard started from the problems of financial savings as well as "economy of knowledge." It merged the traditional ideology of the fiscal authorities and teachers neoideologiya primitivism. And not only in reducing the number of subjects in high school, the case for radical reduction in her level of training. Replacing the existing base and profile levels of instruction sets a new standard, beggarly, the so-called integrated level, which, as they say, through the floor. All this is explained by the demagogic need to allocate more time dealing with the school educational goals. The fact that such problems can be solved today in the educational process, in effect, denied offshore corporation. Standard carries the idea of ??a frontal, verbal education at the level of indoctrination, which, in the opinion of its authors, is more important than any where literature, history, mathematics, physics, etc. The school now "will be taught to love the Motherland."




